DOJ Investigation Tim Walz Jacob Frey: The Minneapolis Probe
MINNEAPOLIS — The Department of Justice is reportedly taking aim at two of Minnesota’s highest-ranking leaders, signaling a sharp escalation in the friction between the federal government and local officials. Sources familiar with the situation say the DOJ has opened an inquiry into Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, looking specifically at whether their public criticism of federal immigration tactics crossed a line into criminal interference.
The probe hinges on a sensitive question: Can an elected official’s words actually obstruct federal agents? Investigators are currently combing through a series of public remarks made by both Democrats to see if their rhetoric emboldened protesters or hampered federal operations in the city.
The Spark: A Mother’s Death and a City’s Rage
The root of this federal offensive isn't just political—it's deeply personal. Minneapolis has been a pressure cooker since the death of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and mother of three who was shot and killed by an ICE officer during an operation last week.
In the wake of the shooting, the federal presence in the city didn't just stay; it surged. While the DOJ and federal agencies have defended the officer involved, Jonathan Ross, Walz and Frey have become the most prominent voices of dissent. They haven’t just called for justice; they’ve attacked the very legitimacy of the federal inquiry, demanding to know why local police were kept in the dark about a fatal shooting on their own streets.
“A Political Tool, Not a Justice System”
On Friday, Governor Walz made it clear he isn’t going to play defense. He framed the investigation as the latest chapter in a broader effort to silence the administration’s critics.
“We’ve seen the pattern,” Walz said, listing other high-profile figures who have recently landed in the DOJ’s crosshairs. “This is what happens when the justice system is twisted into a political weapon. It’s telling that they are investigating us for talking, but they aren't investigating the agent who took a mother's life.”
Mayor Frey was equally defiant, describing the probe as a textbook attempt at intimidation. “They want to scare us into silence,” Frey said in a blunt statement. “But Minneapolis isn't going to be run by threats. I’m standing up for my people.”
The Legal Gamble
According to those close to the inquiry, the DOJ isn't using standard modern statutes. Instead, they are reportedly dusting off an obscure, century-old federal law. This aggressive strategy seems to mirror a memo circulated by Attorney General Pam Bondi just last month, which urged prosecutors to find "creative" ways to investigate anyone labeled a domestic extremist.
Bondi took to social media on Friday to double down, writing that “no one is above the law.”
But for legal scholars, the move feels like a dangerous overreach. Punishing an official for criticizing another arm of government strikes at the very heart of the First Amendment. Aaron Terry, a prominent advocate for civil liberties, noted that when elected leaders fear legal consequences for speaking their minds, “something is fundamentally broken in a free society.”
No End in Sight
As the legal battle lines are drawn in Washington and St. Paul, the reality on the ground in Minneapolis remains grim. On Thursday night, another federal officer opened fire, wounding a man who reportedly fled a traffic stop.
For the family of Renee Good and the protesters who have occupied the streets for over a week, the DOJ’s focus on the Mayor and the Governor feels like a distraction from the blood on the pavement. In 2026, Minneapolis has become more than just a city; it’s a living map of the rift between local governance and federal power.
🔗 For more US political, Global and energy-related news: (Click Here)
